Activision Blizzard settles esports salary cap lawsuit

Ivan Šimić
calendar-icon
Activision Blizzard

Game developer and publisher Activision Blizzard has settled a lawsuit filed by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the former’s soft salary cap for players in two of its leagues.

The lawsuit, which argued that the company “suppressed esports player compensation,” has been settled by the two parties, according to Reuters.

The initial probe into the soft cap on player salaries in the Call of Duty League (CDL) and Overwatch League (OWL) was started back in 2021 by the US DOJ after reports that there was a maximum salary allowed for players.

The story culminated on Monday, April 3rd when the Department of Justice officially filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against the gaming company. In the lawsuit, the DOJ argues that Activision Blizzard “imposed rules that limited competition for players and suppressed the wages of esports players in these leagues.”

The DOJ noted that Activision Blizzard implemented a “Competitive Balance Tax” in the CDL and OWL, aimed at penalising teams in the leagues if a player’s salary exceeds a limit set by the publisher. This means that, according to the Tax, teams could be fined by paying players more than what Activision Blizzard thinks is fair.

Along with a lawsuit, the DOJ suggested a mutual agreement, or a consent decree. The decree would address the concerns of the DOJ by ensuring that Activision Blizzard never imposes any rules that would limit player compensation in any league or tax any party that wants to exceed proposed wages for its players.

However, the company addressed the lawsuit by saying in a statement that “the tax was never levied, and the leagues voluntarily dropped it from their rules in 2021.” Activision Blizzard did agree to the mentioned decree, and the lawsuit will be dropped if the agreement is approved by a federal judge.

The issue of esports player salaries is contentious at the moment. It has been argued that players are earning too much, which hamstrings organisations that are already struggling with the unforgiving economics of esports. A salary cap, in theory, may be a good idea, but as evidenced by the Activision Blizzard lawsuit, any attempt to cap players’ earning potential without unionisation will lead to antitrust scrutiny.

Ivan Šimić

Tech Writer
  • x-icon
Ivan comes from Croatia, loves weird simulator games, and is terrible at playing anything else. Spent 5 years writing about tech and esports in Croatia, and is now doing it here.
Read Full Bio
Stay updated with the latest in Esports Follow Esports Insider for breaking news, features and guides
Add ESI as your preferred source on Google Add ESI as your preferred source on Google
ESI Ranking System
We’ve created a ranking system to help you quickly know how good each gambling platform is. As gamblers ourselves, we know which factors matter most to you, so we follow a best-in-class methodology to test each one with no stone unturned. Once done, we then rank each platform based on the following tiers:
  • A-Tier High-quality sites that deliver a top experience every time. They boast strong performance, nice features, and reliable support, but are just shy of perfection.
  • B-Tier Solid platforms that are worth a spin. They’re safe, fun, and functional, but may be lacking advanced features or have minor drawbacks.
  • S-Tier Reserved for elite operators only. These go well beyond the norm with lucrative bonuses, rewarding promotions, lightning-fast payouts, and a flawless experience overall.
To read more details about how we review casino and betting sites, check out How We Rate Gambling Operators.