ESIC release position paper regarding Esports cheating

Ollie Ring
calendar-icon

Recently ESL changed their position on cheating in competitive Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. Those found guilty of cheating as a result of the Valve Anti-Cheat (VAC) system will be permitted to rejoin ESL‘s competitive ecosystem after two years; whereas previously players could be banned for life. 

It’s safe to say that the decision did not go down lightly with both professionals and the community in general as shown by Karrigan’s tweet below. 

The rule change was not as drastic as several made out. ESL’s policy for violation of their own anti-cheat technology (ESL Wire) had always been two years and thus they claim they were merely ensuring consistency across the board. In a “clarification” statement released later, they stated “We will consult with players, teams, organisations and sports integrity experts such as ESIC on whether the existing policies are still adequate for professional player in Counter-Strike”. 

The Esports Integrity Coalition (“ESIC”) released a paper revealing their position on the controversy. The full paper can be read here. The headline of the position paper reads as follows: 

“Criticism of any one tournament organiser or platform’s position on cheating misses the point, which is, simply that the esports industry is inconsistent and uncoordinated across the board on the issue of cheating”. 

It then breaks it down into subsections including: Cheating, Match-Fixing, Consistency, Procedure, Reasonable Sanctions and Appeals before adding a conclusion and identifying the next steps. It ends with “ESIC will facilitate the discussion by drafting a consultation questionnaire and reaching out to Valve for input. After that, ESIC will start community and publishers outreach to widen the search and evaluate the results”. 

Esports Insider: The paper released by ESIC is well worth a read as it seeks to clarify the wider issues. As tends to be the case with esports, there’s little to no consistency across the board and this is something that needs to change – especially with regards to cheating and match-fixing. 

Ollie Ring

Contributing Editor
Ollie swapped the abacus for Sonic on the SEGA Mega Drive at neighbor Frank's house at an early age and has never looked back. With thousands of hours in Dota 2 (and no ability to show for it), he still clings on to the hope that one day, he will replicate Natus Vincere at gamescom 14 years ago and lift the Aegis of Champions. Ollie has been at the intersection of video games, esports, and gambling for over ten years and has also worked in consultancy in the gambling industry. Ollie's work can be found on the likes of: BBC, Red Bull Gaming, Esports Insider, CasinoBeats, PC Gamer, Green Man Gaming as well as his own thought-leadership substack "Esprouts" looking at specific studies and stories where games meet gambling.
Read Full Bio
Stay updated with the latest in Esports Follow Esports Insider for breaking news, features and guides
Add ESI as your preferred source on Google Add ESI as your preferred source on Google
ESI Ranking System
We’ve created a ranking system to help you quickly know how good each gambling platform is. As gamblers ourselves, we know which factors matter most to you, so we follow a best-in-class methodology to test each one with no stone unturned. Once done, we then rank each platform based on the following tiers:
  • A-Tier High-quality sites that deliver a top experience every time. They boast strong performance, nice features, and reliable support, but are just shy of perfection.
  • B-Tier Solid platforms that are worth a spin. They’re safe, fun, and functional, but may be lacking advanced features or have minor drawbacks.
  • S-Tier Reserved for elite operators only. These go well beyond the norm with lucrative bonuses, rewarding promotions, lightning-fast payouts, and a flawless experience overall.
To read more details about how we review casino and betting sites, check out How We Rate Gambling Operators.