Home / Betting / CS2 / IEM Beijing: Global Open Qualifier 2026 / Eternal Fire vs ex-RUBY

Eternal Fire vs ex-RUBY

Mon 24 Aug, 17:20 Mon 24 Aug 2026, 17:20 BST IEM Beijing: Global Open Qualifier 2026 · Playoffs · BO1
Map by map 1 of 1 played
Map 1 EF 51m

Lineups

Eternal Fire 6 players
MisteM Gareth Ries ZA
RE regali Iulian Harjău RO
BR br0 Alexander Bro DK
WO Woro2k Volodymyr Veletniuk UA
KV Kvem Vladislav Korol UA
JO jottAAA Samet Köklü TR
EX- ex-RUBY 3 players
1E 1eeR Aliaksandr Nahorny BY
H4SAN4TOR Vladyslav Tuchin RU
SH sh1nejezzz Maksim Vinogradov RU

Rosters as listed by the data provider — they include inactive and stand-in players, so they are not a confirmed starting five.

Match Winner Odds

No bookmaker prices yet

None of the books we track are pricing this match. The ESI model view is in the sidebar.

Form & Head-to-Head

Eternal Fire
WW
2W – 0L · 100% win rate
EX- ex-RUBY
LL
0W – 2L · 0% win rate
Head-to-head 1 – 0 in 1 cached meeting
IEM Beijing: Global Open Qualifier 2026 1 – 0 24 Aug 2026

Score shown Eternal Fire first. Counted from completed matches in the ESI cache.

ESI Ranking System
We’ve created a ranking system to help you quickly know how good each gambling platform is. As gamblers ourselves, we know which factors matter most to you, so we follow a best-in-class methodology to test each one with no stone unturned. Once done, we then rank each platform based on the following tiers:
  • A-Tier High-quality sites that deliver a top experience every time. They boast strong performance, nice features, and reliable support, but are just shy of perfection.
  • B-Tier Solid platforms that are worth a spin. They’re safe, fun, and functional, but may be lacking advanced features or have minor drawbacks.
  • S-Tier Reserved for elite operators only. These go well beyond the norm with lucrative bonuses, rewarding promotions, lightning-fast payouts, and a flawless experience overall.
To read more details about how we review casino and betting sites, check out How We Rate Gambling Operators.