HOTU vs FOKUS

Sat 5 Sep, 13:10 Sat 5 Sep 2026, 13:10 BST Stake Ranked Episode 4: Closed Qualifier 2026 · Playoffs · BO3
Map by map 3 of 3 played
Map 1 FOKUS 43m Map 2 HOTU 32m Map 3 FOKUS 58m

Lineups

HOTU 6 players
n0rb3r7 David Danielyan RU
KA kade0 Aydos Khairzhan KZ
MI mizu Dmitry Kondratev RU
LA lampada Mark Ivanov RU
DW Dwushka Aleksandr Pakhnevich RU
FR frontales Kim Argunov RU
FOKUS 5 players
ztr Erik Gustafsson SE
BA Banjo Matias Kivistö FI
PO podi Paavo Heiskanen FI
JO jocab Jacob Nerheden SE
MA Matheos Mateo Prišlin HR

Rosters as listed by the data provider — they include inactive and stand-in players, so they are not a confirmed starting five.

Match Winner Odds

No bookmaker prices yet

None of the books we track are pricing this match. The ESI model view is in the sidebar.

Form & Head-to-Head

HOTU
LWLLW
7W – 3L · 70% win rate
FOKUS
WLWWW
4W – 1L · 80% win rate
Head-to-head 0 – 1 in 1 cached meeting
Stake Ranked Episode 4: Closed Qualifier 2026 1 – 2 5 Sep 2026

Score shown HOTU first. Counted from completed matches in the ESI cache.

ESI Ranking System
We’ve created a ranking system to help you quickly know how good each gambling platform is. As gamblers ourselves, we know which factors matter most to you, so we follow a best-in-class methodology to test each one with no stone unturned. Once done, we then rank each platform based on the following tiers:
  • A-Tier High-quality sites that deliver a top experience every time. They boast strong performance, nice features, and reliable support, but are just shy of perfection.
  • B-Tier Solid platforms that are worth a spin. They’re safe, fun, and functional, but may be lacking advanced features or have minor drawbacks.
  • S-Tier Reserved for elite operators only. These go well beyond the norm with lucrative bonuses, rewarding promotions, lightning-fast payouts, and a flawless experience overall.
To read more details about how we review casino and betting sites, check out How We Rate Gambling Operators.