NIP vs Sangal

Thu 3 Sep, 15:55 Thu 3 Sep 2026, 15:55 BST Stake Ranked Episode 4: Closed Qualifier 2026 · Playoffs · BO3
Map by map 3 of 3 played
Map 1 SNG 44m Map 2 NIP 39m Map 3 NIP 60m

Lineups

NIP 5 players
Snappi Marco Pfeiffer DK
stavn Martin Lund DK
sjuush Rasmus Beck DK
N0 n0te Roman Hamze BE
XK xKacpersky Kacper Gabara PL
Sangal 6 players
AD adamS Adam Marian RO
PA Patsi Robert Isyanov RU
bnox Bartosz Niebisz PL
PU puuha Luka Eklund FI
JO Joey Yeray Serrano Pérez ES
R4 R4DYX Selman Ozan TR

Rosters as listed by the data provider — they include inactive and stand-in players, so they are not a confirmed starting five.

Match Winner Odds

No bookmaker prices yet

None of the books we track are pricing this match. The ESI model view is in the sidebar.

Form & Head-to-Head

NIP
LWW
2W – 1L · 67% win rate
Sangal
L
0W – 1L · 0% win rate
Head-to-head 1 – 0 in 1 cached meeting
Stake Ranked Episode 4: Closed Qualifier 2026 2 – 1 3 Sep 2026

Score shown NIP first. Counted from completed matches in the ESI cache.

ESI Ranking System
We’ve created a ranking system to help you quickly know how good each gambling platform is. As gamblers ourselves, we know which factors matter most to you, so we follow a best-in-class methodology to test each one with no stone unturned. Once done, we then rank each platform based on the following tiers:
  • A-Tier High-quality sites that deliver a top experience every time. They boast strong performance, nice features, and reliable support, but are just shy of perfection.
  • B-Tier Solid platforms that are worth a spin. They’re safe, fun, and functional, but may be lacking advanced features or have minor drawbacks.
  • S-Tier Reserved for elite operators only. These go well beyond the norm with lucrative bonuses, rewarding promotions, lightning-fast payouts, and a flawless experience overall.
To read more details about how we review casino and betting sites, check out How We Rate Gambling Operators.