Home / Betting / Dota 2 / Games of the Future 2026 / GLYPH vs PlayTime

GLYPH vs PlayTime

Mon 3 Aug, 06:15 Mon 3 Aug 2026, 06:15 BST Games of the Future 2026 · Playoffs · BO3
Map by map 3 of 3 played
Map 1 PlayTime 32m Map 2 GLYPH 61m Map 3 PlayTime 33m

Lineups

PlayTime 4 players
SU SunBhie Lee Jeong-jae CA
Scofield Elvis De la Cruz Peña · 4 PE
EL elmisho Yelstin Verde · 5 PE
WI Wits Héctor Max Orozco Alza · 1 PE

Rosters as listed by the data provider — they include inactive and stand-in players, so they are not a confirmed starting five.

Match Winner Odds

No bookmaker prices yet

None of the books we track are pricing this match. The ESI model view is in the sidebar.

Form & Head-to-Head

GLYPH
LWW
2W – 1L · 67% win rate
PlayTime
WWWWL
6W – 3L · 67% win rate
Head-to-head 0 – 1 in 1 cached meeting
Games of the Future 2026 1 – 2 3 Aug 2026

Score shown GLYPH first. Counted from completed matches in the ESI cache.

ESI Ranking System
We’ve created a ranking system to help you quickly know how good each gambling platform is. As gamblers ourselves, we know which factors matter most to you, so we follow a best-in-class methodology to test each one with no stone unturned. Once done, we then rank each platform based on the following tiers:
  • A-Tier High-quality sites that deliver a top experience every time. They boast strong performance, nice features, and reliable support, but are just shy of perfection.
  • B-Tier Solid platforms that are worth a spin. They’re safe, fun, and functional, but may be lacking advanced features or have minor drawbacks.
  • S-Tier Reserved for elite operators only. These go well beyond the norm with lucrative bonuses, rewarding promotions, lightning-fast payouts, and a flawless experience overall.
To read more details about how we review casino and betting sites, check out How We Rate Gambling Operators.