Home / Betting / Dota 2 / Esports World Cup 2026 / PlayTime vs Nigma Galaxy

PlayTime vs Nigma Galaxy

Sat 11 Jul, 13:10 Sat 11 Jul 2026, 13:10 BST Esports World Cup 2026 · Group B · BO2
Map by map 2 of 2 played
Map 1 NGX 66m Map 2 NGX 44m

Lineups

PlayTime 4 players
SU SunBhie Lee Jeong-jae CA
Scofield Elvis De la Cruz Peña · 4 PE
EL elmisho Yelstin Verde · 5 PE
WI Wits Héctor Max Orozco Alza · 1 PE
Nigma Galaxy 5 players
GH Maroun Merhej · 5 LB
SumaiL Syed Sumail Hassan · 1 PK
LO lorenof Artem Melnik · 2 UA
Davai Lama Cedric Deckmyn · 3 BE
OM OmaR Omar Moughrabi · 4 LB

Rosters as listed by the data provider — they include inactive and stand-in players, so they are not a confirmed starting five.

Match Winner Odds

No bookmaker prices yet

None of the books we track are pricing this match. The ESI model view is in the sidebar.

Form & Head-to-Head

PlayTime
WWWWL
6W – 3L · 67% win rate
Nigma Galaxy
WWWWW
8W – 5L · 62% win rate
Head-to-head 0 – 1 in 1 cached meeting
Esports World Cup 2026 0 – 2 11 Jul 2026

Score shown PlayTime first. Counted from completed matches in the ESI cache.

ESI Ranking System
We’ve created a ranking system to help you quickly know how good each gambling platform is. As gamblers ourselves, we know which factors matter most to you, so we follow a best-in-class methodology to test each one with no stone unturned. Once done, we then rank each platform based on the following tiers:
  • A-Tier High-quality sites that deliver a top experience every time. They boast strong performance, nice features, and reliable support, but are just shy of perfection.
  • B-Tier Solid platforms that are worth a spin. They’re safe, fun, and functional, but may be lacking advanced features or have minor drawbacks.
  • S-Tier Reserved for elite operators only. These go well beyond the norm with lucrative bonuses, rewarding promotions, lightning-fast payouts, and a flawless experience overall.
To read more details about how we review casino and betting sites, check out How We Rate Gambling Operators.