Are older Call of Duty titles better than the newer games?

Michael Caruso
Duncan Proctor
calendar-icon
Table of Contents
  1. TL;DR
  2. What is the current COD fan sentiment?
  3. Reasons for Call of Duty’s decline
  4. What can Activision do to improve Call of Duty?
  5. Conclusion: Call of Duty is still a fun franchise, but it could achieve greatness by building on its existing themes
  6. FAQs
A monitor on a desk displays an intense Call of Duty game scene with a soldier, surrounded by fire and debris
Soldier in Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 / Image credit: Call of Duty/Steam

TL;DR

  • Call of Duty has provided fans with fun in over 20 games, but many players believe the first dozen games to be the best of all time.
  • COD Black Ops 2 and MW3 (2011) are often the topic of discussion, as fans believe these older titles have built the foundation for modern COD.
  • Call of Duty is usually slow to innovate, and not all fans believe new mechanics to be good.
  • The increase in live service features and a lack of realism may contribute to the feeling that old Call of Duty games are more enjoyable.
  • Black Ops 7 will add futuristic movement mechanics, like wall jumping, which will offer an opportunity to create an improved version of Black Ops 3’s gameplay in 2025.

Call of Duty is one of the most innovative FPS franchises ever, due in part to its customisation systems and focus on round-based zombie modes. Many in the fanbase consider older CODs, like Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 and Call of Duty Black Ops 2, to be better than their modern-day counterparts.

There are multiple core reasons that the first dozen games felt so different from the Call of Duty titles released in the 2020s, but we need to head back to the 2000s to make sense of the differences.

What is the current COD fan sentiment?

Soldiers of Call of Duty in tactical gear engage in a firefight in a desert village
Soldiers in a picture of Call of Duty Black Ops 2 / Image credit: Call of Duty/Steam

For long-time fans of the popular COD franchise, the first 10 games or so may be nostalgic, but there are quite a few logical reasons why the older titles are better, too. Modern Call of Duty is filled with colourful outfits, seasonal events, and even cartoon crossovers.

Fans of Call of Duty are seeing that the franchise is moving more and more towards a less realistic shooter, as the presence of Beavis and Butt-Head outfits doesn’t make you feel immersed on the battlefield. Additionally, microtransactions lock players out of many exciting cosmetics unless they’re willing to pay expensive prices.

Overall, the Call of Duty community has time and time again expressed a desire for classic, boots-on-the-ground gameplay. The negative reaction to Infinite Warfare’s trailer proves one thing that’s timelessly true for Call of Duty: the fans love gritty realism.

Reasons for Call of Duty’s decline

Beavis wearing a tactical helmet and gear is shouting with an intense expression
Recon Beavis in Call of Duty Black Ops 6 / Image credit: Call of Duty

There are quite a few areas where modern Call of Duty excels, such as in its advanced visuals and upgraded customisation systems. However, multiplayer has grown less entertaining because innovation is rare, and it’s even more rarely accepted by the competitive community.

Futuristic Call of Duty games like Infinite Warfare received strong opposition following initial reveals. Though COD returned to the historic battlefield after Infinite Warfare with WW2, it looks like the upcoming Black Ops 7 will bring advanced movement back to the series.

We’ve found a few common reasons why fans feel the older Call of Duty games are better than those released in the 2020s.

  • Call of Duty was previously more grounded in reality, while now even cartoon characters have been appearing for crossover events.
  • Lack of innovation has created a situation where the multiplayer gameplay in most Call of Duty games feels the same. Additionally, zombie modes are growing stale because they rarely offer new gameplay features compared to something like Black Ops 2’s Tranzit.
  • The absence of live service features in older Call of Duty games allowed for simplistic menu navigation and fewer microtransactions.

Innovation is rare in modern Call of Duty

The lack of realism and successful innovation in modern Call of Duty are the primary reasons that the fanbase often considers the older games to be better. The loadout customisation introduced in Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare was revolutionary, while the zombie maps in Call of Duty World at War breathed new life into the franchise.

Recent COD titles have innovated in cosmetic customisation and limited-time events, but the live service features come at the cost of realism and new gameplay features. There are plenty of fun things only present in Call of Duty games released in the 2020s, like Call of Duty Black Ops 6’s omni-movement, but generally, the franchise has been playing it safe for years at the cost of meaningful progression.

What can Activision do to improve Call of Duty?

An intense scene of Call of Duty on a bridge
First-person gameplay in Call of Duty Black Ops 2 / Image credit: Call of Duty/Steam

There are a ton of ways that Activision could move the Call of Duty franchise forward in a positive way, including by simply creating more game modes. New modes could combine old and new mechanics by offering gritty gameplay with newer features, such as omni-movement.

Innovation is also key, so Activision should consider adding new types of meaningful customisation, which could include protection or weapon types. Call of Duty will always thrive as a boots-on-the-ground shooter, as that’s how it built its fanbase, but there’s always room for more modes or loadout options.

The key to returning COD to its original popularity is showing the gaming community that it can innovate while still staying true to its original ideas.

Conclusion: Call of Duty is still a fun franchise, but it could achieve greatness by building on its existing themes

A tense urban warfare scene from Call of Duty shows soldiers in combat gear exchanging gunfire in a narrow street
Gun fight in Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 / Image credit: Call of Duty/Steam

There’s a clear divide in the Call of Duty community, as many fans prefer the original games to modern takes on the franchise. The first couple of Modern Warfare and Black Ops titles revolutionised the competitive FPS genre like nothing else could in the 2000s, but it’s currently missing its original spark.

Hidden behind the cartoon collabs and paid reward passes is a franchise that thrives on realistic gunplay and cinematic stories, and we’d love to experience another Black Ops 2 in 2025. Call of Duty is only a few innovative ideas away from a new peak, but many fans believe it needs to stick to its grounded, gritty gameplay to reach its full potential.

FAQs

When does the new Call of Duty come out?

The new Call of Duty is Black Ops 7, which will come out on November 14, 2025.

How many Call of Duty games are there?

Call of Duty has 24 mainline titles, including Call of Duty Mobile, the unreleased Black Ops 7, and Warzone.

What is the newest Call of Duty?

The newest Call of Duty is Black Ops 7, which is set for release across multiple platforms on November 14, 2025.

When did the first Call of Duty come out?

The first Call of Duty was originally released on October 29, 2003.

Michael Caruso

Features Writer
  • linkedin-icon
Michael has been a freelance game journalist for six years. With a deep passion for competitive gaming and first-person shooters, he now focuses his time writing about the fast-moving world of esports. If Michael isn't writing, he's likely in a high-stakes match of Fortnite or Call of Duty.
Read Full Bio
Stay updated with the latest in Esports Follow Esports Insider for breaking news, features and guides
Add ESI as your preferred source on Google Add ESI as your preferred source on Google
ESI Ranking System
We’ve created a ranking system to help you quickly know how good each gambling platform is. As gamblers ourselves, we know which factors matter most to you, so we follow a best-in-class methodology to test each one with no stone unturned. Once done, we then rank each platform based on the following tiers:
  • A-Tier High-quality sites that deliver a top experience every time. They boast strong performance, nice features, and reliable support, but are just shy of perfection.
  • B-Tier Solid platforms that are worth a spin. They’re safe, fun, and functional, but may be lacking advanced features or have minor drawbacks.
  • S-Tier Reserved for elite operators only. These go well beyond the norm with lucrative bonuses, rewarding promotions, lightning-fast payouts, and a flawless experience overall.
To read more details about how we review casino and betting sites, check out How We Rate Gambling Operators.